Recent Comments
- Scott Nagle on Can a DM Have Monsters Kill Fallen Characters Without Bringing Hurt Feelings?
- Peter on In D&D, Letting Everyone Roll Certain Checks Guarantees Success, So Why Bother Rolling?
- Beoric on Can a DM Have Monsters Kill Fallen Characters Without Bringing Hurt Feelings?
- Justin Machado on 8 Fast Facts About D&D’s Magic Missile Spell
- Ben Butler-Cole on Can a DM Have Monsters Kill Fallen Characters Without Bringing Hurt Feelings?
Related on Amazon
Archives
DM David
Categories
Meta
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Tag Archives: Tony Bath
Fourth Edition Proved D&D Works Without Saving Throws, So Why Did They Come Back?
Fourth edition dropped saving throws in favor of to-hit rolls and showed that D&D works without saves. Mathematically, to-hit rolls and saving throws just flip the numbers so that a high roll benefits the person casting the die. Rather than … Continue reading →
Posted in Role-playing game design, Role-playing game history
|
Tagged armor class, elegance, Mike Mearls, saving throws, to-hit rolls, Tony Bath, traps
|
22 Comments
For 25 Years, D&D Put Saving Throws In Groups Made For Just 3 Creatures and 2 Spells
Today, Dungeons & Dragons of matches saving throws to ability scores. But for most of the game’s history, D&D grouped saving throws by 5 sources: spell or staff, wand, death ray or poison, turned to stone, and dragon breath. These … Continue reading →
Posted in Role-playing game history
|
Tagged Chainmail, Dungeon Master's Guide, Gary Gygax, saving throws, Tony Bath
|
5 Comments
